Williams shelves transit bill that angered local officials in county

SACRAMENTO — Assemblyman Das Williams has shelved a bill that sought to force local government officials in Ventura County to spend all money they receive from a state tax designed to fund local transit services for its intended purpose.

The action, which came on the eve of a scheduled hearing before the Senate Transportation Committee, means the bill is dead for this year, as Friday is the deadline for bills to advance out of policy committees.

The bill's demise sets the stage for negotiations among local officials and members of the county's legislative delegation to come up with a plan that can be approved by the Legislature next year. Absent that, under the provisions of current law, Ventura County's special exemption to use some of the money for road and street maintenance will expire July 1, 2014.

Last year, the county and its cities received about $28 million in Transit Development Act funds, about $4 million of which was spent on transportation needs other than transit, according to the Ventura County Transportation Commission.

Williams, D-Santa Barbara, represents Ventura and much of Oxnard. He said it made sense to pull the bill given the intensity of opposition from local government officials in Ventura County and the fact that there remains a full year to attempt to fashion a compromise.

"I remain committed to making sure that Ventura County residents get a better transit system," he said.

Simi Valley City Manager Mike Sedell, who has been leading the efforts of local officials to block Williams' bill, said Tuesday he was pleased the measure was shelved. He said the Ventura County Transportation Commission will try to schedule a meeting next month among local legislators and county officials to discuss how to proceed.

State Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, serves on the Senate panel that was scheduled to consider the bill. She had publicly said she would vote against it in its current form, and her opposition, given that she represents two Ventura County cities, probably ensured that the bill would not have made it out of the committee.

Pavley said she intends to meet with legislative colleagues — including Sen. Lois Wolk, D-Davis, the author of the 2009 bill that gave Ventura County flexibility not afforded to other similarly-sized counties — to see "whether there's an ability to extend the timeline" for the county to comply.

She said a federal grant application submitted by the four cities in eastern Ventura County spells out in detail a plan to improve transit services in that end of the county.

"The four east-county cities have a quite well thought-out plan for fixed-route bus service connecting all the four cities," she said. "It could very well fit the substance of Sen. Wolk's bill. There is a specified plan — not just a concept."

The 2009 legislation said the county could submit a comprehensive transit plan to the Legislature for review before the 2014 cutoff. Such a plan was submitted to lawmakers in April.

Wolk told The Star last month that she considered the plan "an embarrassment" and that she would resist any effort by county officials to retreat from what she considers an agreement that they struck three years ago.

Pavley said that, given the economic circumstances of cities in the wake of the elimination of redevelopment agencies, an extension for Ventura County might not be unreasonable.

"A lot of the cities could use a little flexibility," she said.

© 2012 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Topics

Comments » 10

smithjc#403367 writes:

wait a minute. local government idjits are objecting to this? they object to being required to spend money on its intended purpose? wow, spending money on what it was intended for, what a concept. i mean, i'm no fan of das williams (far from it, never voted for him, never will) but, as much as it pains me to admit it, it sounds like he's right for a change.

john411 writes:

The state has spent too much time robbing our cities of funding. Nothing wrong with leaving a little to fix our roads.

fibus writes:

in response to Novotopia:

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Sounds right to me.
But two inherent problems in Ventura County is terrain and relative low density.
Terrain we can't do anything about except bore tunnels and level hils. But where would the money come from? And most Venturans want to keep low density.
The cost of private transportation continuing to rise public transportaion is needed but the solution is not an easy one.

kenternst writes:

It just amazes me to see that there can be any justification to using tax dollars for any purpose other than the purpose that the tax was originally imposed on the tax payers to be used for. It just proves that taxpayers are not represented and it does not matter what party they are. I am a Republican but I applaud this Democrat for actually trying to do what is right and represent his constituents as he was elected to do. I will remember what he tried to do come the next election. I have no problem crossing party lines, unlike some people. Usually thieves try to hide what they do, not argue their need to steal and I will remember that when it comes time to re-elect these local officials that think stealing funds that are not for their intended purpose.

reachout writes:

Fran Pavley is right. Sometimes even great plans have to be set aside when hard times hit. Flexibility in spending is essential during times of fiscal crisis.

Seneca1854 writes:

A little research shows this was an unnecessary bill. Legislation by Sen. Wolk awhile back stipulated that all these monies had to be diverted away from road repairs and solely to transit. Ventura County was given an exemption to keep using a small amount for roads until 2014. Apparently Williams wanted to push the deadline up with his bill. Cities had plans for this money and just lost their RDA money which was also used to fix roads. Another grab by the state.

Ventura County is strapped to fix its highways, no doubt about it. Voters have not approved a local tax to do this like other similar counties have.

john411 writes:

in response to Novotopia:

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

The state in this case is a single legislator who wants to make decisions that should best be left to the cities. This guy has a history of doing this.

rebel123 writes:

I am not sure why spending money as it was lawfully intended has raised hackles. If that's where it was supposed to go, that's where it should go. Ventura certainly needs a better public transit system.

Seneca1854 writes:

School districts were given freedom by the state on how to best use funding when the categoricals were eliminated. Cities should also have this freedom. Keep these decisions local. The state has already handed cities too many unfunded mandates and restrictions. Mass transit and road repairs are both worthy uses for these dollars. Buses need roads to travel on, too.

manchu49 writes:

Buy a bike.

Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.

Featured Promotions

Videos


Social

Wire

Features